Article: why criticism matters

Posted in Uncategorized on April 7, 2011 by ttillack

I simply have to blog this article. It’s says so much about the critic in today’s literary world and shines a strong beacon of hope for us hopeless literary romantics. Here’s a juicy quote to whet the appetite: “The secret function of the critic today is to write beautifully, and in so doing protect beautiful writing.”

I also love this comment:

“I have seen students rush out to buy “Anna Karenina” because an essay by James Wood made them feel that Tolstoy was essential. If it’s even just these couple of students, alone on planet Earth, who have read that essay and rushed out, those couple of students are to me sufficient proof of the robustness and purpose of the eloquent critic, of his power to awake and enlighten, of his absolutely crucial place in our world.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/02/books/review/Roiphe-t-web.html

A special thanks as always to Paige Turner, who I have to admit is one of my chief sources of literary intelligence and wonderfulness. With her finger on the pulse of that living and breathing thing we call literature, be sure to check out her blog at Paige Loves Books.

Is critical theory a stillborn project?

Posted in Critical theory, Frankfurt School, Max Horkheimer on April 3, 2011 by ttillack

Just read the following statement in Max Horkheimer’s Traditional and Critical Theory chapter in his book Critical Theory: “critical theory has no material accomplishments to show for itself.” This is rather depressing as critical theory is what I’m devoting myself to now and for the foreseeable future of my academic career. The problem is that people (aside from intellectuals) believe that the world can’t be changed; therefore, critical theory becomes somewhat stillborn in a world that is blinkered by its own hand.

This is a neat segue to the tagline of this blog: “I planted in them blind hopes”. That is exactly what the culture industry is set up to do: to instill subjects in society with false hopes of prosperity, or a ‘good life’. The only place that a utopia – or even the potential of utopia – can be experienced is in the mindless consumption of desire. We count our blessings that we have the opportunity for a ‘good life’, but don’t want to seem to struggle for what could be a better life; a better life for all.

Review: A new stage of capitalist culture?

Posted in Capitalism, Critical theory, Culture, Review, The Internet on April 2, 2011 by ttillack

Just finished reading Eva Illouz’s Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Without having to explicate her thesis over a hefty monograph, she manages to adroitly and concisely build on and revise the intellectual legacy of critical theory. Presenting her argument over three lectures, by looking at emotions and capitalism, she is able to take the reader through her argument for a new stage of capitalist culture.

In the process she is also able to reflect on the project of criticism, and resist what she calls “pure critique”, even though, as she suggests “it is as if the designers of Internet dating sites [a chief of object of her discussion] had read and applied, to the letter, the diagnosis of doom and gloom by critical theorists, such as Adorno and Horkheimer…[t]he Internet seems to bring the process of rationalisation of emotions and love to levels not dreamed of by critical theorists” (91).

Highly recommended – and at just 114 pages – a lightning quick read!

Illouz, E. (2007) Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Polity Press: Cambridge and Maiden.

Review: The Finkler Question by Howard Jacobson

Posted in Literature, Review on December 4, 2010 by ttillack

When reading a literary award winner, and especially one as prestigious as the Man Booker, I can’t help but be on the lookout for the quality with which the judges deemed it worthy. Prior to reading this year’s winner, The Finkler Question by Howard Jacobson, I also managed to read Peter Carey’s short-listed Parrott and Olivier in America. Having won the award twice already, Carey was up for a historical third, and closing the final pages I felt that he had a winner. And so when the winner was announced I was surprised that Jacobson was the judge’s pick.

Having just finished The Finkler Question, I’m happy with their decision. It’s a remarkable novel in its simplicity and execution. He doesn’t pull any literary tricks, and I think it’s this straight-forward approach, coupled with his genius wit and comic, yet very human flair, which allows him to traverse questions of identity, belonging and exclusion, family, friendship, racism, love and death. Not afraid to speak of the big H – that is, the Jewish Holocaust – he poses interesting philosophical questions faced by contemporary Jews. In doing so, he also manages to explore the nature of Jewishness, and with great honesty, interrogates the difficult issues of present day anti-Semitism and the justification of Israel, and the problems in Gaza.

There is no hard and fast rule that a winner must tackle the big questions, for example last year’s winner Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel, a historical account of the Protestant Reformation and fictional biography of Thomas Cromwell, wasn’t beating any particular drum, but I think the judges would have been impressed with how Jacobson has managed to tackle the issues mentioned above.

Who is Prometheus? When will I get to see fireworks?

Posted in Mythology on October 12, 2010 by ttillack

To answer these questions, it is first necessary to take a brief lesson in classical mythology.

With a name meaning ‘forethought’, Prometheus was blessed with quick intelligence, and came to be associated with notions of ‘crafty counsel’. As a recurring figure throughout Greek mythology, and in various versions, he is attributed with creating mankind, and giving humans the gift of fire, which he stole from Zeus, and which brought on the god’s wrath in the form of the severest punishment. For the misogynist and highly patriarchal ancient Greeks, this was the creation of woman in the figure of Pandora, who would then, from her box, release evil upon the world.

“But the noble son of Iapetus outwitted him and stole the far-seen gleam of unwearying fire in a hollow fennel stalk. And Zeus who thunders on high was stung in spirit, and his dear heart was angered when he saw amongst men the far-seen ray of fire. Forthwith he made an evil thing for men as the price of fire”.

“But when he had made the beautiful evil to be the price for the blessing, he brought her out, delighting in the finery which the bright-eyed daughter of a mighty father had given her, to the place where the other gods and men were. And wonder took hold of the deathless gods and mortal men when they saw that which was sheer guile, not to be withstood by men.”

“For from her is the race of women and female kind: of her is the deadly race and tribe of women who live amongst mortal men to their great trouble, no helpmeets in hateful poverty, but only in wealth.”

Hesiod, The Theogony (700 B.C.)

Prometheus was also personally punished, and was chained to the side of what are today the Caucasus mountains in Georgia, where every day an eagle (or vulture) would tear his flesh and eat out his ever-regenerating liver. According to the play written by Aeschylus, Prometheus Bound, the fire that he stole was Hephaestus’s own ‘brilliant “flower” of fire, deviser of all the arts.’ Chained to the mountain, Prometheus expresses his bitterness because, although he with his mother fought on the side of Zeus against the Titans, his only reward is torment.

In one section of the play, Prometheus lists the many gifts he has given to mankind for whom he suffers:

“Listen to the troubles that were among mortals and how I gave them sense and mind.”

“They did not know of brick-built houses that face the sun or carpentry, but dwelt beneath the ground like tiny ants in the depths of sunless caves. They did not have any secure way of distinguishing winter or blossoming spring or fruitful summer, but they did everything without judgement, until I showed them the rising and the setting of the stars, difficult to discern.”

“And indeed I discovered for them numbers, a lofty kind of wisdom, and letters and their combination, an art that fosters memory of all things, the mother of the Muses’ arts.

Aeschylus, Prometheus Bound (415 B.C.)

The myth has been reprised through the entire history of the arts, and still continues in today’s culture. Comparatively, there are echoes and similarities in many other cultures including Native American, Indian, Norse. There are also resonances which appear in Christian mythology – punishment for the sins of mankind (accepting fire). In some accounts he is also chained to the mountain in a cross-formation, the obviousness of which needs no further explanation.

In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, which was also subtitled “The Modern Prometheus”, she takes a dim look at what the effects of the gift of fire have been for mankind. In this regard, Prometheus is not the saviour of mankind, but something of a devil, whom she blamed for bringing fire to man and seducing the human race to the vice of eating meat (fire brought cooking which brought hunting and killing, and by extension – war and industrialisation). Shelley was interested in Prometheus as ‘the maker’, ‘artist’ and ‘shaper’ of men, which she portrayed through the scientist-hero figure of Victor Frankenstein.

In some ways, the modern experience – and certainly the postmodern – finds us in a similar situation to the monster he created. We are similarly manipulated by forces that are beyond our control (which are human managed) – science, technology, the ‘machinery’ of State, globalisation, the mass media – all of which link’s our predicament to the monster’s; he who was put together from dead human parts and then infused with ‘a spark of being’, without having any say in the form or genesis of his (and our) own life.

So, as you can see, Prometheus works to bring out interesting ethical and philosophical questions. What humans do with their ‘creative spark’ is up to them. It can lead to horrors such as Auschwitz and the atomic bomb, or it can lead to the United Nation’s Declaration of Human Rights, or to great artworks, literature, film or television.

That’s my project. To make ethical choices with the ‘creative spark’ I possess. Whether it has been given to me, is a question of religion, and not a belief I hold. What I do believe in is the free transfer of energy – in pyrotechnics of creativity and boundless artistic and intellectual endeavour.

Welcome

Posted in Personal on October 12, 2010 by ttillack

Welcome to my new blog – Promethean Pyrotechnics. This blog first started off a repository for writing experiments as I made my way through a year of creative units at university. However, I’ve since changed my course and steering much more towards theory units. So now I hope for this site to become a place of exchange where I can share my progress in my learning; be that through reviews, essays, or reflexive ponderings.

Thanks for reading, and enjoy the ride.

Tim

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.